State College, PA - Centre County - Central Pennsylvania - Home of Penn State University

Judge to Hear Arguments in Paterno Family's Fight to See Freeh Documents

by on May 18, 2014 7:45 AM

An important legal skirmish will play out in a Centre County courtroom Monday morning with Joe Paterno's family pursuing its legal battle with the NCAA and Penn State.

A judge will hear oral arguments concerning a proposed subpoena the family of the late Penn State football coach wants to serve against both parties.

That subpoena targets a slew of documents from the Louis Freeh investigation regarding how Penn State handled the Jerry Sandusky child sexual abuse scandal and how the NCAA reached the decision to issue unprecedented sanctions against the university.

In the lawsuit suit, the family asks for damages related to the sanctions the NCAA leveled against Penn State's football program following Sandusky's arrest. The former Penn State football assistant coach is now a convicted pedophile. The lawsuit also asks the court to overturn a consent decree between Penn State and the NCAA that allowed the NCAA to impose the sanctions.

The pending subpoena targets the Pepper Hamilton law firm, the successor to Freeh's original law firm.

A hearing on the matter is slated for 10 a.m. Monday at the Centre County Courthouse before Potter County Judge John Leete, who is specially presiding over the case.

In recent weeks,, the Paterno family, NCAA and Penn State have filed a flurry documents making various legal arguments.

Penn State objects to the proposed subpoena, saying the request for such documents and other information, including phone records and emails, violates attorney-client privilege as well as other privileges.

The university says the demands are unrealistic and overly costly. During the Sandusky investigation, the Freeh firm collected more than 3.5 million emails and other documents, according to the university.

Penn State also says many of the documents requested are already part of public domain and therefore plaintiffs should be able to access them on their own. Additionally, Penn State also asked the court not to approve any subpoena until after the court issues a protective order related to the documents.

The Paterno family says Penn State's objections are improper, meritless and do not justify barring the issuance of the subpoena.

"A year after his case was filed, the (NCAA), now joined by (Penn State), continues to do anything it can to prevent discovery from going forward," Paterno family attorney Thomas Weber writes. "Penn State's objections to the plaintiff's subpoena to Pepper Hamilton seeking the raw material underlying the Freeh Report is simply one of several steps these defendants have taken to slow down the discovery process."

At the same time, the NCAA says the Paterno family has made unsuccessful attempts to discredit the Freeh report developed by independent investigator and former FBI director, which indicated senior administrators at Penn State allegedly tried to cover-up the Sandusky abuse. Three former Penn State administrators currently face criminal charges for that alleged cover-up.

"To date absolutely nothing has come out in the public domain to shake any confidence in Judge Freeh's report, let alone show it was unreasonable for the NCAA and Penn State to rely on it in 2012, other than the purported findings of paid consultants working at the direction of the Paterno Estate," the NCAA says.

The Paterno family challenged that statement in its own filing.

"(A)lthough it is running from merits in court, (the NCAA) has continued to peddle this misleading information to the media, adding further insult to injury to the irreparable injuries it has already caused," the filing states.

The filing goes on to state, "As part of this delay and conceal strategy, the NCAA has openly threatened Penn State with additional sanctions, including the so-called 'death penalty,' if Penn State does not come to heel. ... It is not surprising that the NCAA and its allies do not want this litigation to shine a light on the NCAA's egregious misconduct, for they are the ones who ran roughshod over plaintiffs' rights when they imposed the consent decree and, without process, accused plaintiffs of being complicit in horrific acts. But the judicial system does not allow the 'accept our word' approach that the NCAA and Penn State have adopted."

The lawsuit includes five allegations: breach of contract, intentional interference with contractual relations, injurious falsehood and commercial disparagement, defamation, and civil conspiracy.

The Paterno family is joined in the lawsuit by multiple members of the Penn State Board of Trustees, former Nittany Lion football players, and university faculty members. In the suit, former coaches argue they cannot obtain employment due to the findings of the Freeh Report.

Related Stories:

Paterno Family Continues to Push for Subpoena in NCAA-Penn State Lawsuit, Accuses NCAA of Adding 'Insult to Injury'

Penn State Maintains Opposition to Proposed Subpoena in Paterno Lawsuit

NCAA Defends Consent Decree, says Paterno Family Rewriting History

Penn State Continues to Make Case to Stop Pending Paterno Subpoena

Paterno Family Continues to Argue the Lawsuit Against NCAA, Penn State is Fair



Jennifer Miller is a reporter for StateCollege.com. She has worked in journalism since 2005. She's covered news at the local, state and national level with an emphasis on crime and local government.
Next Article
Penn State Football: Franklin Hopeful For Facilities Upgrade
May 18, 2014 6:00 AM
by Ben Jones
Penn State Football: Franklin Hopeful For Facilities Upgrade
Related Articles
Comments
Disclaimer: Copyright © 2014 StateCollege.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

order food online